LP reporting & performance

TVPI, DPI and RVPI Explained: PE & VC Fund Performance Metrics

By aama.io Fund Operations Team · Last reviewed 2 October 2026

DPI, RVPI and TVPI are fund performance multiples measured against paid-in capital. DPI is distributions divided by paid-in capital, the cash actually returned. RVPI is remaining net asset value divided by paid-in capital, the value still held. TVPI is DPI plus RVPI, the total value created so far.

Key facts

DPICumulative distributions ÷ paid-in capital (realised)
RVPIResidual NAV ÷ paid-in capital (unrealised)
TVPI(Distributions + residual NAV) ÷ paid-in capital = DPI + RVPI
BasisNet to LPs, after fees and carry
DenominatorPaid-in capital, not total commitment
ReportedQuarterly in LP reports

How it works

  1. Start with paid-in capital. Paid-in capital is the total an LP has actually contributed to date through capital calls. It is not the commitment, which includes capital not yet called.
  2. Measure what has come back. DPI divides cumulative distributions to the LP by paid-in capital. It is the only one of the three that is cash in hand.
  3. Measure what is still held. RVPI divides the LP's share of the fund's residual NAV by paid-in capital. It depends on valuations, so it is an estimate.
  4. Add them for the total. TVPI is DPI plus RVPI. As a fund matures and exits investments, RVPI falls and DPI rises, while TVPI converges on the final multiple.

Worked example: A mid-life fund

An LP has paid in $80M. The fund has distributed $20M to it, and its share of remaining NAV is $100M.

DPI ($20M ÷ $80M)0.25x
RVPI ($100M ÷ $80M)1.25x
TVPI (0.25x + 1.25x)1.50x

The fund shows a 1.50x total value, but only 0.25x has been returned in cash. That gap is why LPs watch DPI as closely as TVPI.

Common mistakes

  • Dividing by commitment instead of paid-in capital.
  • Reading a high TVPI as realised performance when most of it is RVPI, which rests on valuations.
  • Comparing a gross deal-level multiple (MOIC) with a net fund-level TVPI.
  • Comparing funds of different ages without adjusting for vintage. Young funds sit below 1.0x because of the J-curve.

The Singapore and APAC angle

There is no Singapore-specific definition, but APAC LPs are commonly multi-currency, so state the reporting currency and the FX basis behind paid-in capital, distributions and NAV. For a VCC, report at sub-fund level, since each sub-fund has its own investors, NAV and cash flows.

Frequently asked questions

See how aama.io fits

VC / PE Firms

Capital calls, distributions, carry and LP communications in one place.

Explore

Related terms

Sources

ILPA Reporting Template

General information, not tax, legal, accounting or investment advice. This content is sourced from the references above and from public regulatory material, and it can become outdated. Always confirm the current position with your fund documents and the ILPA reporting guidance, and take professional advice for your specific situation, before relying on it.