What is a Distribution Waterfall? PE & VC Fund Waterfalls Explained
By aama.io Fund Operations Team · Last reviewed 2 October 2026
Key facts
| Defined in | The limited partnership agreement (LPA) |
|---|---|
| Common tiers | Return of capital → preferred return → GP catch-up → carried interest split |
| Typical preferred return | 8% a year, compounding (negotiated per fund) |
| Typical carry | 20% of profits |
| Two main models | European (whole-fund) and American (deal-by-deal) |
| Protection for LPs | GP clawback if carry is overpaid |
How it works
- Tier 1: return of capital. Distributions first go to LPs until they have received back all capital they have contributed. In a European waterfall this is all contributed capital across the fund; in an American waterfall it is the capital for the deals being realised.
- Tier 2: preferred return (hurdle). LPs then receive a preferred return on their contributed capital, commonly 8% a year compounding. The GP earns no carry until this hurdle is cleared.
- Tier 3: GP catch-up. The GP then receives a large share, often 100%, of distributions until it has received its carry percentage of total profit so far (preferred return plus catch-up). A partial catch-up (for example 50%) is also used.
- Tier 4: carried interest split. All remaining proceeds are split between LPs and the GP at the carry ratio, typically 80% to LPs and 20% to the GP.
- Clawback. If the GP has been paid more carry than it is entitled to over the fund's life, which is more likely under an American waterfall, the LPA may require it to return the excess.
Worked example: European waterfall: $100M fund, $180M of proceeds
LPs contributed $100M. The fund distributes $180M in total. Terms: 8% compounding preferred return, 100% GP catch-up, 20% carry. For simplicity, assume all $100M was outstanding for 4 years, so the preferred return is $100M × (1.08⁴ − 1) ≈ $36M.
| Tier 1: return of capital to LPs | $100M |
| Tier 2: preferred return to LPs | $36M |
| Tier 3: GP catch-up (solves C = 20% × (36 + C), so C = 9) | $9M |
| Distributed after tier 3 | $145M |
| Tier 4: remaining $35M — 80% to LPs | $28M |
| Tier 4: remaining $35M — 20% to GP | $7M |
| Total to LPs ($100M + $36M + $28M) | $164M |
| Total carry to GP ($9M + $7M) | $16M |
Total profit is $80M ($180M − $100M) and the GP's $16M is exactly 20% of it. A full catch-up restores the GP to the headline carry rate once the hurdle is cleared.
Common mistakes
- Assuming 20% carry is paid on all profit regardless of the hurdle. Below the preferred return the GP earns nothing.
- Mixing up the catch-up percentage with the carry percentage. They are separate negotiated terms.
- Modelling an American waterfall as if it were European. Early deal-by-deal carry can exceed the whole-fund entitlement and trigger a clawback.
- Ignoring management fees and fund expenses, which are part of the capital LPs must get back in tier 1.
The Singapore and APAC angle
Waterfall terms are set in the fund documents (LPA for a limited partnership; the constitution and subscription documents for a VCC), not by Singapore law, so the economics are market-negotiated. What the Singapore context adds is operational: a VCC with several sub-funds needs the waterfall calculated per sub-fund, and the GP's carry tax treatment depends on whether the fund holds a Section 13O or 13U incentive.
Frequently asked questions
Free tools
See how aama.io fits
VC / PE Firms
Capital calls, distributions, carry and LP communications in one place.
Related terms
Sources
ILPA Principles 3.0General information, not tax, legal, accounting or investment advice. This content is sourced from the references above and from public regulatory material, and it can become outdated. Always confirm the current position with your fund documents (LPA) and legal counsel, and take professional advice for your specific situation, before relying on it.